What phrase is excluded from Navy legal assistance correspondence language?

In Navy legal assistance correspondence, the phrase "by direction" is excluded because it implies that the author is acting on behalf of someone else who holds a higher authority. This terminology is not suitable for legal correspondence, which should convey clarity and direct accountability. In legal contexts, it is important for communication to reflect personal responsibility and to be straightforward, as legal documents may influence significant outcomes.

On the other hand, the other phrases—such as "in accordance," "policy statement," and "directive"—can all serve appropriate purposes in legal documentation. "In accordance" may refer to adherence to policies or regulations, "policy statement" can outline the stance on specific issues, and "directive" may provide specific instructions or orders without implying a lack of direct involvement from the author. Hence, the exclusion of "by direction" helps maintain the integrity and accountability necessary in legal correspondence.