Email correspondence containing which characters will be considered to have been signed by the person whose name appears below those characters?

The use of "/s/" as a signature convention in email correspondence indicates that the person whose name appears below those characters has authorized the content of the email. This practice stems from legal and formal communications, where "/s/" is often used to signify that the signature has been electronically affixed.

This convention helps clarify the intent of the person corresponding, ensuring that the recipient understands that the email’s contents are indeed endorsed by the named individual. In digital communications, where physical signatures are not feasible, this approach has become recognized and accepted as a valid form of authentication. Hence, when you see "/s/" preceding a name, it is clear that the person has given their consent or approval to the message's content.

Other choices do not carry the same recognized weight or credibility as a signature. For example, "@signature" and "-signed-" may imply signing but are not as universally acknowledged in formal contexts. Similarly, "[sig.]" does not have established legal standing and might be confused with a notation rather than a signature. Therefore, "/s/" is the correct choice as it's widely understood and used to signify an electronic signature in correspondence.